Moral knowledge and public education

7os_26cb1wo-griffin-keller

Dallas Willard on morality, knowledge, and higher education:

So in fact higher education and the elite professional groups continue to pressure and teach on moral matters—good, bad, right, wrong—and if you don’t believe it just get crossways of what is advocated in morality by them and you will be subjected to full blown moral opprobrium. That’s because in fact no one can separate life from morality. Moral sentiment and moral opinions are always in full force, and perhaps more so now than ever, because they are not subject to rational criticism in open discussion. One of the things that used to happen in higher education and elite circles, though certainly not in a perfect way, was that moral teachings were surfaced, talked about, and subjected to rational criticism. Now they’re not. What is taught is taught by example, tone of voice, selection of subject matters and so on—oftimes by unguarded explicit statements—but there’s no rational criticism directed at them because it’s not taken to be an area of rationality or knowledge. Pressure, however, abounds.

Why does it matter whether or not there is moral knowledge? This is really the heart of the matter: Knowledge alone confers the right and responsibility to act, to direct action, to set policy, to supervise policy and to teach. Sentiment does not do that. Opinion does not do that. Tradition does not do that. Power does not do that. You expect people who act to know what they are doing, don’t you? You probably would not take your car to a shop that said on a sign in front of it, “We are lucky at making repairs,” or “We’re inspired,” or “We feel real good about it.” This is not a matter of convention. It is how knowledge actually works in human life, and it’s very important to understand that. Without moral knowledge there is no moral authority. Hence there is only “Political correctness,” even though it looks and feels ever bit like morality and often assumes a distinctively moral tone and force.

The Failure of Evangelical Political Involvement in the Area of Moral Transformation.

14 years to pay of your education

That’s how long they think it will take the average Canadian University graduate to pay off their debt.

In Canada, research showed that post-secondary students could be paying for their education an average of 14 years after they graduate.

Most student loans in Canada and the U.S. are taken on by the government, and James Saft, a columnist at Reuters, lamented the fact that lenders do not consider a borrower’s ability to repay:

“In a market dominated by the federal government, which accounts for more than 90% of all such loans, it is remarkable that lending criteria take absolutely no account of current or future repayment capacity,” he said.

Seen here as the government’s problem, I wonder if its really the students’ problem.  And since students think they are “untouchable” most are not really thinking about paying off their debts yet.  Most are overconfident of how easy its going to be.

14 years.

Time to think twice.

Quote is from the Financial Post.

Universities, inefficient by design…

Universities are inefficient by design but also have big payoffs for society.

We assume that private enterprise generates what is so casually called “innovation” all by itself. It does not. The Web browser you are using to read this essay was invented at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The code that makes this page possible was invented at a publicly funded academic research center in Switzerland. That search engine you use many times a day, Google, was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation to support Stanford University. You didn’t get polio in your youth because of research done in the early 1950s at Case Western Reserve University. California wine is better because of the University of California at Davis. Hollywood movies are better because of UCLA. And your milk was not spoiled this morning because of work done at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

Read more of this article at Slate.

ilinktoit, 15 Nov 2008

Ann Graham Lotz, a great preacher and reverent maverick
Is it true?  Why the economy fares better under democrats
Bill Gates Foundation supporting innovation
Getting off the credit train.
Paying attention; Aboriginal education levels a limiting factor.
Exploring the benefits of solitutde.
We are finding ways to cut back.
Abraham Piper gives clues to writing a good blog.
Vancouver made the Christian Science Monitor.
Private Schools, the credit crisis and gardens.
The new truth on stretching.
Nicolas Perrin writes on Sinaiticus digitized.